Satish Kumar Banjara v. Smt. Uttara Bai

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRR No. 772 of 2021 1.

Satish Kumar Banjara S/o Shri Shivram Banjara, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Jhalari, P.S. Lormi, District Bilaspur Now Mungeli (C.G.).

---- Applicant

Versus

1.

Smt. Uttara Bai W/o Satish Kumar Banjara, Aged About 30 Years, Caste Satnami, 2.

Ku. Lalita D/o Satish Kumar, Aged About 11 Years, Through Natural Guardian Mother, Both are resident of Thana Lormi, Tahsil Lormi District Bilaspur (CG.) at present resident of Manjhawapara, P.S. Civil Lines, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.).

---- Respondents For Applicant :

Mr. Ravipal Maheshwari, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya Order on Board 29/10/2021 1) Heard on I.A. No. 01/2021, application for condonation of delay of 4197 days in filing the present revision.

2) The applicant/husband has filed the instant revision under Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act against the oder dated 13/01/2010 passed by the Family Court Bilaspur in Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 285/2007 directing the applicant to pay a sum of Rs. 800/- per month to the respondent No. 1.

3) Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is a Labour, he had gone out for his livelihood and was not aware of the legal proceedings. Therefore, the present revision could not be filed within time. This apart he submits that the COVID-19

Pandemic also caused further delay in filing the revision. 4) Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the fact that the impugned order was passed on 13/01/2010 whereas the reasons assigned by the applicant for such delay do not appear to be proper and acceptable. The application I.A. No. 01/2021, for condonation of delay is hereby rejected. Subsequently, the revision petition is also dismissed as being barred by limitation. -Sd/- (Gautam Chourdiya) Judge Chandrakant