High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6606/2019disposed off

Dr. Vijay Giri Goswami v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-08-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6606 of 2019 Dr. Vijay Giri Goswami S/o Late Jeevan Giri Goswami Aged About 64 Years Currently Working As District Ayurved Officer, Bastar, (Chhattisgarh), R/o Hanuman Nagar, New Hanuman Mandir, Deep Pooja School Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director Department Of Ayush, Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Collector District Bastar, Chhattisgarh., District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh

4. Dr. J R Netam Currently Posted As Ayurved Medical Officer, Government Ayurvedic Dispensary, Matkot, Tokapal, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh., District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Vaibhav Shukla, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Dy. AG Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 28/08/2019

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order of transfer Annexure P-1 dated 08.08.2019. Vide the said impugned order the petitioner has been transferred from Bastar to Baloda Bazar.

2. Substantial ground on which the petitioner is challenging the impugned order is that he has got only 8 month's of service left for retirement and under the transfer policy of the State Government the

-2person who has got less than 1 year's service left for retirement should not have transferred.

3. Given the aforesaid contentions and transfer policy of the State Government, let petitioner make a detailed representation within a period of 10 days from today and on receipt of the representation, the respondents shall take a decision within a period of 45 days.

4. Till the representation of the petitioner is decided, the effect and operation of the impugned order Annexure P-1 shall remain stayed so far as the petitioner is concerned.

5. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge