High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5340/2020disposed off

Surendra Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-01-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 5340 of 2020 1.

Surendra Singh S/o Late Ram Darash Singh Aged About 48 Years R/o 18/13, Nehru Nagar (East) Bhilai District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Energy Department, State Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission Through Chairman, Irrigation Colony, Shanti Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Secretary, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Irrigation Colony, Shanti Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Sourabh Dangi, Advocate.

For State :

Shri Sudeep Verma, Dy. Govt. Advocate.

For Respondent No.2&3 :

Shri Shivang Dubey, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 20.01.2021 .

1. The challenge in the present writ petition was the inaction on the part of the respondents in not considering the representation of the petitioner seeking for up-gradation in the entries made in the ACRs of the petitioner for the year 2016-17, 2017-18 and 2018-19.

2. After filing of the present writ petition when the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the respondents No.2&3 submits that as regards the entries of the grading of the years 2016-17 and 201718 are concerned, the authorities have allowed the representation of the petitioner and have upgraded the gradings and now the grievance of the petitioner remains only so far as grading awarded in the year 2018-19. The counsel for the respondents No.2&3 further submits that even the representation of the petitioner for the said year of 2018-19 is also under active consideration and a decision shall be taken at the earliest.

-23. Given the said submissions by the counsel for the respondents No.2&3, the writ petition at this juncture stands disposed of expecting the respondents No.2&3 to take a decision on the representation of the petitioner at the earliest preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder