← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/4958/2016dismissed

Awadhram Alias Bedu Tandan And ANR. v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-08-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 4958 of 2016 • Awadhram Alias Bedu Tandan S/o Derhu Prasad Aged About 23 Years R/o Bagbahara, Thana / Tahsil Bagbahara, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

• Laxminarayan Alias Aadity S/o Mayaram Madhukar Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Charaudabandh, Thana Khallari, Tahsil Bagbahara, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

--- Applicants

Versus

• State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Bagbahara, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent For the applicants :

Mr. Vikash Pradhan, Advocate For the Respondent :

Mr. Lav Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order on Board 30.08.2016

1. This is first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking grant of regular bail to the applicant in connection with Crime No. 86/2016 registered at P.S. Bagbahara, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G) for the offence punishable under Section 457, 380/34 of IPC.

2. As per the prosecution case, a report was lodged by complainant Dev Prakash Chandrakar that in the intervening night of 15th & 16th of May, 2016 a theft was committed in his house and certain gold and silver ornaments, wrist watch, wall clock, TV, DVD and other household articles total worth Rs.1,40,000/- as also cash of Rs.1,20,000/- were stolen from his Almirah. Subsequently the applicants were arrested on 25.5.2016 and on their memorandum, the goods were recovered which have been identified by the complainant.

3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated and only on the basis

of a memorandum, the applicants have been inculpated in 3 cases, therefore, they may be enlarged on bail.

4. Per contra, learned State Counsel opposes the bail.

5. Perused the case diary.

6. Considering the fact that the goods which were stolen by the applicants have been identified by the complainant after its recovery, I am not inclined to allow this bail application. Accordingly, it is rejected.

Sd/- GOUTAM BHADURI JUDGE R a o