Chhannu Maravi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Misc. Criminal Case No.5603 of 2015

1. Kamal Kishor Manikpuri, S/o Uttam Das Manikpuri, aged 26 years, R/o Village Uslapur, P.S. Chakarbhata, Civil and Revenue District Bilaspur (C.G.)

2. Sushil Kumar Tiwari, S/o Ramsundar Tiwari, aged 19 years, R/o Village Uslapur, P.S. Chakarbhata, Civil and Revenue District Bilaspur (C.G.) ---- Applicants

Versus

State of Chhattisgarh, Through Station House Officer, P.S. Chakarbhata, Bilaspur (C.G.) ---- Non-applicant AND Misc. Criminal Case No.5604 of 2015 Chhannu Maravi, S/o Joidha Maravi, aged 35 years, R/o Village Uslapur, P.S. Chakarbhata, Civil and Revenue District Bilaspur (C.G.) ---- Applicant

Versus

State of Chhattisgarh, Through Station House Officer, P.S. Chakarbhata, Bilaspur (C.G.) ---- Non-applicant For Applicants:

Mr. Indrasen Sahu, Advocate.

For Non-applicant:

Mr. Suvigya Awasthi, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 13/10/2015

1. Since both the applications are arising out of same dispute and same crime number, they are being disposed of by this common order.

2. The accused/applicants have moved these bail applications under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for releasing them on regular bail during trial in connection with Crime No.270/2015, registered at Police Station Chakarbhata, Distt. Bilaspur, for the offence punishable under

Sections 457 and 380 read with Section 34 of the IPC.

3. Taking into consideration the nature and gravity of offence, facts and circumstances of the case, the manner in which the applicants and one another accused person have stolen TV, grinder, fan and utensils worth Rs.25,000/- on 16-8-2015 from the house of complainant Ghanshyam Markam and consequent recovery from the applicants, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the applicants. Consequently, both the applications are rejected.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Soma