Satya Prakash Mishra v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6142 of 2018 Satya Prakash Mishra S/o Shri Omprakash Mishra, Aged About 34 Years, No. R-350, Head Constable, Vip Battln. Mana And Posted At ExMla, Lundra, Village Post And P.S. Dhourpur, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh.

---Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Home Department (Police), Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Director General Of Police, Chhattisgarh, Police Head Quarter, Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Director General Of Police, Phq (Naxal Operations), Raipur Chhattisgarh.

4. Inspector General Of Police, Surguja Division, Surguja Chhattisgarh.

5. Superintendent Of Police, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh.

6. Arvind Kumar Khalko, Presently Working As T.I. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

7. Suman Minj, R-12, Head Constable Posted At Chando, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For petitioner :

Shri Sushil Dubey, Advocate.

For State :

Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 19/09/2018 1.

The grievance of the petitioner in the instant Writ Petition is that, the petitioner while working as a Constable at Police Station Chando, District Balrampur (C.G.) in the year 2005, he was involved in the Naxalite operations.

2.

According to the counsel for the petitioner, the people who were associated with the petitioner have been duly considered for out of turn promotion by the authorities, but without assigning any reason the petitioner has been left out. He further submits that, the petitioner has made detailed representation in this regard to the authorities which too has not been decided till date. He further contended that, similarly placed person had already filed a Writ Petition i.e. WPS No. 5911/2014 before this Court which was allowed by this Court on 20/07/2015.

3.

Given the said facts, which are not disputed by the State counsel on advance copy, the Writ Petition itself is disposed off with a direction to the respondents No. 2 & 3 to take a decision on the representation of the petitioner Annexure-P/6 dated 19/11/2016 at the earliest preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4.

The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Sumit JUDGE