← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWA/696/2018disposed off

Pd. Chhitani Prashad Mitani Prashad Dubey Dharmada Trust Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-09-11Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WA No. 696 of 2018 • Pd. Chhitani Prashad Mitani Prashad Dubey Dharmada Trust Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, Through Its President Mahesh Dubey S/o Shri Prayag, Dubey, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Gond Para Police Station City Kotwali Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Appellant

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Urban Development Department Mantralay New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Municipal Corporation Bilaspur Through The Commissioner Municipal Corporation Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

3. The Commissioner Municipal Corporation Bilaspur , District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

4. Collector Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :

Shri Kishore Bhaduri and Shri Pawan Kesharwani, Advocates For Respondents- 1 and 4/State :

Shri UNS Deo, Government Advocate For Respondents- 2 and 3/ Municipal Corporation Shri Prafull N Bharat, Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi , Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi , Chief Justice 11.09.2018 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and respondents. 2.

Against orders dated 25.06.2014 till 05.12.2016 passed by the Collector Najul, an appeal has been preferred before the Secretary, Revenue, Government of Chhattisgarh by the appellant in the present writ appeal. Till now no decision has been taken. In fact, the Court is informed that the said appeal has not even been registered.

wa 696 of 2018 3.

Let a fresh application be filed by the appellant before the competent authority who is directed to hear the parties to the dispute including the appellant and then pass an appropriate order preferably within a period of 8 weeks. The fresh application on behalf of the appellant must be filed before the concerned authority within a week. 4.

Present appeal stands disposed off with liberty as above. Sd/- Sd/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge padma