High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6179/2018allowed

Smt. Neetu Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-09-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6179 of 2018 Smt. Neetu Singh W/o Shri Devendra Singh Aged About 34 Years Lecturer Panchayat (English) Posted In Government Higher Secondary School, Sardha, Block Bilha, District Bilaspur Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department Mahanadi Bhavan New Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Director, Panchayat And Social Welfare Department Indrawati Bhavan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. The District Education Officer, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

4. The Collector Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

5. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

6. The Block Education Officer, Bilha Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Manoj K. Sinha, Advocate For State :

Mr. Syed Majid Ali, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 20/09/2018

1. Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions wherein the circular dated 23.04.2016 has been quashed, petitions allowed and it has been declared that the petitioners therein shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post.

2. In view of the aforesaid submission and the impugned order and action is based on circular dated 23.04.2016 which has been quashed in the case referred to herein above, the petition also deserves to be allowed with the direction that the petitioner shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered her on a lower post or on the same post.

3. No order as to costs.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved