High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6647/2019disposed off

Shailendra Kumar Shrivastava v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6647 of 2019 Shailendra Kumar Shrivastava S/o - Late B.P. Shrivastava Aged About 43 Years Working As Sub Engineer Public Works Department (Electrical And Mechanical ), Sub Division, Mahasamund, R/o - Imlibhata, Mahasamund, Tahsil And District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Public Works Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur,district Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Engineer In Chief, Public Works Department (Electrical And Mechanical) Sirpur Bhawan, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Superintendent Engineer, Public Works Department (Electrical And Mechanical) Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department (Electrical And Mechanical) Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Hemant Kesharwani, Advocate For State :

Mr. Ayaz Naved, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 02/09/2019

1. The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 16.08.2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from Public Works Department (Elec. & Mech.) Division Raipur to Division Jagdalpur.

2. Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner wants that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents raising the objections and grievances on his being transferred and the respondents in turn may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

3. Not opposed.

4. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner if he so chooses may prefer a detailed representation to the respondents, which in turn considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved