High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/4409/2021disposed off

Jasbir Singh Bath Security Agency v. Union Of India

2021-11-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant2 pages

WPC No. 4409 of 2021 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 4409 of 2021 • Jasbir Singh Bath Security Agency Registration OfÏce At A12/16, Sector 3, Uday Society, Tatibandh, Raipur Chhattisgarh Through Its Proprietor, Shri Jasbir Singh Bath S/o Tara Singh, Aged About 60 Years.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Defence, Government Of India, Department Ex-Servicemen Welfare, South Block New Delhi.

2. Directorate General Of Resettlement Through Its Principal Director, Government Of India, Ministry Of Defence, West Block-IV, R. K. Puram, New Delhi Pin Code-110066

3. Directorate Resettlemant Zone (Central) Through Its Additional Director General, Government Of India, Ministry Of Defence, C/o HQs Central Gommand, Lucknow (U. P. ) Pin Code 226002

4. National Mineral Development Corporation Limited (NMDCL) (Government Of India Undertaking) Through Its Chairman-CumManaging Director (CMD), Khanij Bhawan, Castle Hills, Masab Tank, Hyderabad Telangana

5. Chief General Manager National Mineral Development Corporation Limited (NMDCL), BIOM, Bacheli Complex, Post Bacheli, District Dantewada Chhattisgarh

6. General Manager (Personnel) National Mineral Development Corporation Limited (NMDCL), BIOM, Bacheli Complex, Post Bacheli, District Dantewada Chhattisgarh

7. Shri Narendra Ambade AGM (Personnel), National Mineral Development Corporation Limited (NMDCL), BIOM, Bacheli Complex, Post Bacheli, District Dantewada Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioner Mr. Amrito Das, Advocate

WPC No. 4409 of 2021 For Respondents 1, 2 & 3 Mr. TD Diwan, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Assistant Solicitor General For Respondents 4 to 7 Mr. Vaibhav Shukla, Advocate SB.: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order On Board 8/11/2021

1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition has become infructuous.

3. In view of the statement made, this petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.

Sd/- ( Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge Shyna