Maheshwar Prasad Dubey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6151 of 2018 Maheshwar Prasad Dubey S/o Late Bahoran Prasad Dubey, Aged About 46 Years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Indira Awas Konar, Pamgarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Pamgarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.

4. Block Education Officer, Pamgarh, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For petitioner :

Shri K.S.Pawar and Shri Shashi Kushwaha, Advocates.

For State :

Ms. Astha Shukla, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 19/09/2018 1.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2.

By this Writ Petition the petitioner is claiming Kramonnati. According to the petitioner, he has already completed 10 years of service and was entitled for the benefit of kramonnati.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has also filed representations before the respondents authorities, but the same are not being considered.

4.

At this juncture, learned counsel for the State would submit that if the petitioner submits a fresh representations along with copy of the petition before the concerned competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law.

5.

In view of the above, the petition is disposed off. If the petitioner files a fresh representation before the concerned competent authority along with copy of the petition within a period of one month from today, the said authority is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law and on its own merits, as early as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of representations along with copy of this order.

6.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the representations, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Sumit JUDGE