← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6236/2018disposed off

Raghevendra Kumar Rathore v. State Of Chhatisgarh

2018-09-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 6236 of 2018 Raghevendra Kumar Rathore S/o Shri Harishchandra Rathore, Aged About 40 Years, Working As Assistant Grade- 3, Office Of Superintending Engineer, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Energy Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited (An Enterprises Of Government Of Chhattisgarh), Through Its Managing Director, Dagania Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The General Manager, Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. The Deputy General Manager, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Holding Company Limited, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. The Chief Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Production Company Limited, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri V. R. Tiwari, Advocate For State : Ms. Astha Shukla, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 26.09.2018 Counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute raised by the petitioner in this case is the action on the part of the respondents withholding the increment payable to the petitioner which on an earlier

occasion was granted but subsequently was withdrawn by the Management. He submits that a representation dated 25.07.2018 in this regard has already been filed by the petitioner before respondent no.2 which is pending consideration.

2.

Given the said limited dispute raised by the petitioner, let respondent no.2 scrutinize the claim of the petitioner and decide his representation in accordance with the rules and regulations governing the service condition of the petitioner as also the scheme under which the petitioner was granted employment. Let the decision be taken by respondent no.2 within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

3.

With the aforesaid observation the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Bhola