← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6671/2019disposed off

Chandra Kumar Chandrakar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6671 of 2019 Chandra Kumar Chandrakar S/o Late Shri R L Chandrakar Aged About 53 Years Presently Working As Head Master (Middle School) Government Middle School Bhothapara, Police Station Keregaon, Block Nagari District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. District Education Officer Dhamtari District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. N. Naha Roy, Advocate For State :

Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 02/09/2019

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 21.08.2019, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from the post of Head Master (Middle School), Govt. Middle School, Bhothapara, Block Nagari, District Dhamtari to the post of Head Master (Middle School), Govt. Middle School, Indagaon, Block Mainpur, District Gariyaband..

2. The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the District Secretary of Chhattisgarh Tritiya Varg Shashkiya Karmachari Sangh, Dhamtari and therefore thereby the petitioner falls within the protected category under the transfer policy of the State Government.

3. Given the said facts, let the petitioner make a detailed representation to the respondents within a period of 10 days from

today and the respondents in turn shall decide the representation within a further period of 45 days from the date of receipt of representation. Meanwhile, there shall be a stay of the effect and operation of the impugned order, so far as the petitioner is concerned.

4. The authorities concerned are also directed to verify the fact whether the petitioner does fall under the protected category under the transfer policy of the State Government or not.

5. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved