High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6739/2019disposed off

Vinod Mishra v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6739 of 2019 Vinod Mishra S/o Shri Rampal Mishra Aged About 53 Years R/o Vaishnav Colony, Radheshyam Kunj, Baloda Bazar, Police Station, Tahsil And District Baloda-Bazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Commercial Tax (Excise), Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Police Station And Post Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. District Excise Officer (D.E.O.) Office Of D.E.O., Department Of Excise, Baloda-Bazar, District Baloda-Bazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

3. Assistant District Excise Officer (A.D.E.O.) Control Room (Ware House), Department Of Excise, Baloda-Bazar, District BalodaBazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Advocate For State :

Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 02/09/2019

1. The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 13.08.2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara to District Balrampur-Ramanujganj.

2. Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner wants that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents raising the objections and grievances on his being transferred and the respondents in turn may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

3. Not opposed.

4. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner if he so chooses may prefer a detailed representation to the respondents, which in turn considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved