Jeevandas Manikpuri v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 4676 of 2017 Jeevandas Manikpuri S/o Ghasidas Manikpuri Aged About 37 Years R/o Village Lingiyadih, Police Station Sarkanda, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Sarkanda, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For the Applicant :

Shri Sanjay Patel, Advocate For the Non-applicant :

Shri Vijay Bahadur Singh, Panel Lawyer ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board 01/11/2017

1. This is the first bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC and there is no bail application is pending before any other Court.

2. Perused the case diary provided by the learned counsel for the State in connection with the Crime No. 256/2017 registered at Police Station Station Sarkanda, District Bilaspur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Case of the prosecution, in brief is that Smt. Gunja Bai is the wife of the present applicant. On 06/04/2017 by 01.30 p.m. in Durga Nagar Lingiyadih, Bilaspur applicant caused number of injuries on the head of his wife by pointed part of the scrue driver. When the sister of the Smt. Gunja Bai namely Ku. Pooja Manikpuri was trying to separate her sister then applicant has also beaten her. The reason for causing

injury to the applicant's wife was that said applicant on impression that she has illicit relation with other person.

4. As per the injury report there were four incised wound were found on the head of wife of the applicant. One puncture was found on the neck of the applicant's wife. As per the opinion of Doctor multiple injuries were found in the vital organs of the body so injuries may be danger in nature.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant has not committed alleged offence, there was no intention to kill the wife, charge-sheet has already been filed, thus bail may be granted to the applicant.

6. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

7. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, looking to the seriousness of the alleged offence and also the impact of granting bail on the society, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the applicant.

8. Consequently, bail application is dismissed. Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge Kamde