High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCC/795/2019allowed

Ajay Kumar Nanwani v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 795 of 2019 • Ajay Kumar Nanwani S/o Late Nanak Ram Nanwani Aged About 38 Years R/o 38 Nanak Nivas, Capital City, Phase-1, Behind Ambuja Mall, Urkura Road, Saddu, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Accommodation And Environment, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh,

2. Commissioner-Cum-Director Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh,

3. Collector District Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer Raipur Development Authority, Bhakt Mata Karma Parisar, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh,

5. Municipal Corporation, Raipur Through Its Commissioner, Raipur Chhattisgarh,

6. Sanjay Bajpai, Builders Private Limited (New Swagat Vihar Project) Through - Its Managing Director Smt. Sarita Bajpai, R/o 3rd Floor, Krishna Complex, Jail Road, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, ---- Respondents For Applicant :

Mr. Tarun Dansena, Advocate For State/ Respondents No. 1 to 3 :

Mr. R.K. Bhagat, Deputy Government Advocate For Respondent No. 4 :

Mr. Anurag Verma, Advocate For Respondent No. 5 :

Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 03.09.2019

1. Heard on application for restoration of WPC No. 2517 of 2016.

2. Learned Counsel for the applicant is seeking restoration of Writ Petition (C) No. 2517 of 2016 which was dismissed by this Court for want of prosecution vide order dated 29.07.2019.

3. On due consideration of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and the grounds taken in the restoration petition, I am

satisfied that the absence of the applicant's counsel on 29.07.2019, when the Writ Petition (C) No. 2517 of 20169 was taken up for hearing, was based on bonafide grounds.

4. The M.C.C. No. 795 of 2019 is, therefore, allowed and the Writ Petition (C) No. 2517 of 2016 is restored to its original number for hearing and disposal in accordance with law.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Vishakha