Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited v. Ramesh Kumar Shedpure

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 530 of 2015

1. Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited through its Managing Director, Daganiya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant

Versus

1. Ramesh Kumar Shedpure S/o Shri Shivnarayan Shedpure, aged about 42 years, Junior Engineer (Civil), Office of Chief Engineer (Civil Project), Shed No.-II, Dagania, CSEB, Raipur, R/o HIG-1/84 Sector 1, Dindayal Upadhyay Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Sanjay Sharma S/o Baldeo Prasad Sharma, aged about 41 years, Junior Engineer (Civil), Office of Additional S.E. (Civil), H.Q. Division, CSEB, Raipur, R/o D-8, CSEB Colony, Dagania, Raipur, Distt. Raipur C.G.

3. Dindayal Choudhary S/o Damodar Prasad Choudhary, aged about 39 years, Junior Engineer (Civil), Office of the Executive Engineer (Civil), CSEB, Bhilai-3, R/o MIG-218, Padmanabhpur, Durg, Distt. Durg C.G.

4. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Department of Energy, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur C.G., Present Address- State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Energy, Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office & Police Station Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G.

5. Omprakash Banchhore, aged about 52 years, A.E. (Civil), Office of Executive Engineer (Civil), CSEB, Bhilai-3, District Durg C.G.

6. Ajay Kumar Nema, aged about 42 years, AE (Civil), Office of Executive Engineer (Civil), HTPP, Maintenance Division, Korba (West), District Korba C.G.

7. Yuvraj Dewangan, aged about 42 years, AE (Civil), Office of Executive Engineer (Civil), CSEB, Bhilai-3, District Durg C.G. ---- Respondents/Non-applicants For Applicant - Shri B.D. Guru, Advocate.

For Respondents 1 and 3 - Shri Aditya Tiwari, Advocate. For Respondent No.4 - Shri Adhiraj Surana, Deputy Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker Hon'ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai Order on Board 12/01/2017

1. Heard on I.A.No.1, application for condonation of delay in filing the MCC.

2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Delay in filing the present MCC is condoned.

3. Heard on restoration application.

-24. For the reasons mentioned in the application in particular in para 5 and 6, the same is allowed. MCC No. 87 of 2014 is restored to its original number.

Sd/- Sd/- (Pritinker Diwaker) (Chandra Bhushan Bajpai) Judge Judge Aadil