← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6743/2019disposed off

U.S. Agarwal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6743 of 2019 U.S. Agarwal S/o - Late Shri R.C. Agarwal Aged About 57 Years Presently Posted As Principal, Iti Bhilai Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Skill Development And Technical Education And Employment Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director, Directorate Of Skill Development And Technical Education And Employment Department Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. T.R. Tanwar, Principal, Government Iti, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Syed Majid Ali, Advocate For State :

Mr. Ayaz Naved, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 02/09/2019

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 20.08.2019, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from ITI Bhilai, District Durg to ITI Bishrampuri, District Kondagaon.

2. The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner in the past in the year 2012 to 2018 has worked in the scheduled area in Jagdalpur and he has been sent on transfer to Durg and now the petitioner is being sent to another core scheduled area contrary to the transfer policy of the State Government. According to the petitioner, there are many other officers in the Department who have never been posted to any of the scheduled areas working on the same post, where the petitioner is working.

3. Given the said facts, let the petitioner make a detailed representation to the respondent authorities within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order and the respondents in turn shall consider and decide the same within a further period of 45 days. Till then the effect and operation impugned order, so far as the petitioner is concerned, shall remain stayed.

4. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved