← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhREVP/9/2015dismissed

The Dy.General Manager Disciplinary Authority And ANR. v. P.Murli Mohan Rao

2017-08-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR REVP No. 9 of 2015

1. The Dy.General Manager (Disciplinary Authority) And Anr. ThruState Bank Of India, Regional Office, Bilaspur C.G.

2. The General Manager Thru - Departmental And Personal Banking (Appllate Authority), State Bank Of India, Local Head Office, Bhopal M.P.

---- Petitioners

Versus

1. P.Murli Mohan Rao S/o Madan Mohan Rao R/o Presently Posted And Working As Manager, State Bank Of India, Saketh Road Branch, Kapra, H.No. 1/1/28/65 Jai Kisan Colony, Saketh Road Kapra. Dist. Ranga Reddy (Telangana) ---- Respondent For Petitioners:

Shri B. D. Guru, Advocate.

Respondent:

Shri P. Murli Mohan Rao, appears in person.

Single Bench:Hon'ble Shri Sanjay Agrawal, J Order On Board 09.08.2017 1.

Heard on admission.

2.

This Review Petition has been preferred against the order dated 24.12.2014 passed by this Court in W. P. No. 2030/2001, wherein it has been observed at para 4 and 5 as under :- "4.

The Court does not find any infirmity in the Departmental Proceedings for the manner in which the Respondents have proceeded by giving a second show cause for a difference of opinion and then ordered censure.

5.

The petitioner is stated to have filed appeal against the same also unsuccessfully. The order of punishment warrants no interference."

3.

While observing as such, it has been observed while considering the submission of Respondents that if the period of censure has expired and his case of promotion was kept in sealed cover, then it may be opened subject to any other issues and/or proceedings that may be pending or in which orders may have been passed.

4.

Upon going through the directions contained in the order aforesaid, I do not find any mistake or error apparent on the face of the record so as to require to be interfered in this petition. Accordingly, this Review Petition is devoid of merit, is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. Sd/- (Sanjay Agrawal) JUDGE Nikita