← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6851/2019disposed off

Dr. Smt. Maya Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS. No. 6851 OF 2019 Dr. Smt. Maya Yadav W/o - Dr. Shri S.K. Yadav Aged About 50 Years Presently Working As Assistant Professor (Political Science), Government P.G. Arts And Commerce College, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Principal, Govt. P.G. Arts and Commerce College, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ---Respondent(s) For Petitioner :

Mr. N. Naha. Roy, Adv.

For State :

Mr. Ayaz Naved, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 05.09.2019

1. Counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, has moved an application for correction in the cause-title in as much as the details of the respondents have been wrongly got typed.

2. Not opposed.

3. Accordingly, I.A No. 02 of 2019 stands allowed.

4. Let necessary correction be carried out during the course of the day itself.

5. The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order (AnnexureP/1) dated 21/08/2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from the Govt. P.G. Arts and Commerce College, Bilaspur to the Govt. P.G. College Champa Distt. Janjgir-Champa.

6. The contention of the petitioner is that this is the third transfer within a span of 2 years. Earlier two order was passed on 01.10.2018 and the previous order was passed on 14.08.2017. Thus, It is a case

where the petitioner has been transferred third time within the span of two years.

7. Given the aforesaid facts of the case, let the Petitioner make a detailed representation to the respondents in this regard within a period of 10 days and respondents in turn shall take a decision within a period of 45 days.

8. Till the representation is decided, there shall be a stay of the effect and operation of the order so far as the petitioner is concerned.

9. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed off. Sd/-- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Jyotijha