← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5465/2020rejected

Sanjay Kumar Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-12-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5465 of 2020 Sanjay Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Muneshwar Prasad Yadav Aged About 33 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher (Science) At Government Higher Secondary English Medium Excellent School, Mahalpara, Block Baikunthpur, District Koriya Chhattisgarh., District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary School Education Department , Mantralaya , Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2.

Under Secretary School Education Department, Mantralaya , Mahanadi , Bhawan, Nawa Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3.

Director Directorate Of Public Instruction Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4.

Joint Director Directorate Of Public Instruction , Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5.

Collector Koriya , District Koriya Chhattisgarh., District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 6.

District Education Officer Koriya , District Koriya Chhattisarh., District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Harshmander Rastogi, Advocate For State :

Mr. Jitendra Pali, Dy. A.G.

Mr. Rahul Jha, Govt. Advocate Ms. Akanksha Jain, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 17/12/2020

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order of transfer dated 08.12.2020 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from Govt. Higher Secondary English Medium Excellent School, Mahalpara, Block Baikunthpur, District Koriya to Govt.

Higher Secondary School, Kelhari, Block Manendragarh, District Koriya.

2.

Considering the short distance between the two place of posting this Court does not find any strong case made out calling for an interference with the impugned order. The writ petition therefore deserves to be and is accordingly rejected.

3.

However, the right of the petitioner stands reserved for approaching the authorities by making suitable representation seeking for any modification or different place for posting, which if made, the authorities are expected to take a decision at the earliest in accordance with law.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved