← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5493/2020disposed off

Shyam Agnihotri v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-01-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 5493 of 2020

1. Shyam Agnihotri S/o Late Shjri Devidas Agnihotri Aged About 64 Years Working As Wireless Operator At Forest Range Office, Dondi Block Dondi, District Balod Chhattisgarh, R/o Mig-1/625, Hudco, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Forest Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Head Chief Conservator Of Forests Division Aranya Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Conservator Of Forest Durg Forest Division, G.E. Road, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh

4. Divisional Forest Officer Balod , District Balod Chhattisgarh

5. Joint Director Treasury , Account And Pension , Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Shashi Kumar Kushwaha, Advocate For State :

Mr. Avinash Singh, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 22.01.2021

1. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is the non settlement of final and full pension payable to the petitioner.

2. According to the petitioner, he was working on the post of Wireless Operator and has retired from service w.e.f. 31.03.2018 after completing 33 years and 5 months of service.

3. According to the petitioner after his retirement, he has been paid only anticipatory pension though he has received the entire gratuity payable

to him.

4. The grievance of the petitioner is that though he has retired and more than three years have lapsed and that there is no impediment on the part of the petitioner in getting full pension payable to him yet he is being paid only the anticipatory pension.

5. Given the aforesaid factual matrix of the case, let the respondents No. 3 to 5 take necessary steps in ensuring that the claim of the petitioner for releasing of full pension is decided at the earliest preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. In case if the petitioner is entitled for full pension, the same be released within a further period of 30 days.

6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Jyotijha