Nand Kumar Tandan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 6384 of 2021

1. Nand Kumar Tandan S/o Shri Suklal Tandan Aged About 46 Years Working As Lecturer And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Achhoti, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

2. Neeraj Shukla S/o Shri Suresh Shukla Aged About 47 Years Working As Lecturer And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Charmudiya, Block Kurud, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

3. Neelkamal Sahu S/o Shri Mehattar Sahu Aged About 45 Years Working As Lecturer And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Darra, Block Kurud, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

4. Ashwani Prasad Shukla S/o Shri Khamhan Prasad Shukla Aged About 39 Years Working As Lecturer And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Achhoti, Block Kurud, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

5. Smt. Kanchan Shukla W/o Shri Ashwani Prasad Shukla Aged About 37 Years Working As Lecturer And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Kondapar, Block Kurud, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Director Office Of Directorate Of Panchayat Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Office Zila Panchayat Dhamtari District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For State :

Shri Soumya Rai, Panel Lawyer S.B.:

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 22/11/2021 Heard.

1.

Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the issue involved in this petition is covered by decision rendered by this Court in the case of Avinesh Kumar Namdev and ors. v. State of Chhattisgarh and ors. ( WPS No.5328/2021) in which in paragraphs 5 and 6, this Court observed - "5.

Given the limited grievance that the petitioners have i.e. for clearance of the arrears of payment at the earliest and considering the fact that it is almost 10 months now that the decision of the respondents Annexure P/3 was taken on 22.12.2020, ends of justice would serve if the writ petition at this juncture disposed of directing the respondents to ensure that the entire arrears of payment payable to the petitioners are cleared at the earliest preferably within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order, failing which the entire amount shall carry interest @ 10% p.a. from the date of order Annexure P/3 dated 22.12.2020 till the actual date of payment is made.

6. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed of."

2.

Accepting the submission of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is finally disposed off in terms of paragraphs 5 and 6 passed in the case of Avinesh Kumar Namdev (supra). No order as to cost (s). Sd/- ( Sanjay K. Agrawal ) Judge Deepti