← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6107/2018disposed off

Abhay Shrivastava v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-09-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6107 of 2018

1. Abhay Shrivastava S/o Shri Rajendra Prasad Shrivastava, Aged About 30 Years, Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Musrakala, Block Dongargarh, DistrictRajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

2. Smt. Vandana Tulavi W/o Shri Banshilal Tulavi, Aged About 30 Years, Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Musrakala, Block Dongargarh, DistrictRajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

3. Ku. Arati Devdas D/o Krishnalal Devdas, Aged About 40 Years, Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Paragaonkhurd, Block Dongargarh, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

4. Annu Kumari Thakur D/o Late Shri Meghnath Thakur, Aged About 31 Years, Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Mangchuwa, Block Doundilohara, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh.

5. Ghana Ram Patel S/o Shri Hariram Patel, Aged About 38 Years, Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Chikhalakasa, Block Chhuriya, DistrictRajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

6. Rewat Ram Sahu S/o Shri Tularam Sahu, Aged About 39 Years, Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Chikhalakasa, Block Chhuriya, DistrictRajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through- Secretary, Department Of Panchayat Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Balod, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Rajnandgaon, DistrictRajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ---Respondents

For petitioners :

Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate.

For State :

Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 18/09/2018 1.

Learned Counsel for the parties submits that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by the order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions, wherein allowing the petitions, the circular dated 23.4.2016 has been quashed and it has been declared that the petitioners therein shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post. 2.

In view of the aforesaid submission, since the impugned order or action is based on circular dated 23.4.2016 which stands quashed in the case referred above, the present writ petition also deserves to be allowed with the direction that the petitioners shall also be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post. 3.

The writ petition thus stands finally disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Sumit JUDGE