High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6668/2019disposed off

Gend Ram Chaturvedi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6668 of 2019 Gend Ram Chaturvedi S/o - Shri Parsu Ram Chaturvedi Aged About 52 Years Presentably Posted And Working As Block Education Officer, Navagarh District Bemetara Chhattisgarh, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Education Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director, Public Education Director, Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Director, State Education Research And Training Institute, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. District Education Officer, Bemetara, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh ----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Sunil Singh Rathore, Advocate For State :

Ms. Ishwari Ghritlahare, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 02/09/2019

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 22.08.2019, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from the post of Block Education Officer, Navagardh, District Bemetara to the post of Principal, Government Higher Secondary School, Jhal, District Mungeli.

2. The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the District President of Chhattisgarh Pradesh Rajpatrit Adhikari Sangh, District Branch Bemetara and he has been reelected on the said post in the year 2017 and thereby the petitioner falls within the protected category under the transfer policy of the State Government.

3. Given the said facts, let the petitioner make a detailed representation to the respondents within a period of 10 days from today and the respondents in turn shall decide the representation within a further period of 45 days from the date of receipt of representation. Meanwhile, there shall be a stay of the effect and operation of the impugned order, so far as the petitioner is concerned.

4. The authorities concerned are also directed to verify the fact whether the petitioner does fall under the protected category under the transfer policy of the State Government or not.

5. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved