← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRCA/1203/2018allowed

Sunny Sonkar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-10-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.Cr.C.(A) No. 1203 of 2018 Sunny Sonkar S/o Shri Rajesh Sonkar Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Sakri P. S. Sakri, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through P. S. Sakri, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent For the Applicant :

Shri Dheerendra Pandey, Advocate.

For the Respondent/State :

Shri Neeraj Kumar Mehta, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant

ORDER

26.10.2018 1.

Heard on application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

2.

This is the first bail application filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant who is apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No. 192 of 2018 registered at police station Sakri, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh for the offence punishable under Sections 307/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

It is submitted by counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. The FIR in this case does not reflect the name of the applicant and his name was added later on. Hence, it is prayed that the applicant be benefited with grant of anticipatory bail.

4.

Learned State counsel opposes the bail application and the submissions made in this respect.

5.

Heard counsel for both the parties and perused the case diary. 6.

Complainant - Deepak Sahu has lodged FIR when he had been to dhaba for having meals. Co-accused - Rahul Makhija alongwith his companions picked a quarrel with the complainant and others and assaulted with knife causing various injuries. Hence, this case. 7.

As the name of the applicant is not reflected in the FIR, I am of the considered opinion that the applicant deserves to be released on anticipatory bail.

8.

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicant in connection with the aforesaid offence, he shall be released on bail by the Officer arresting him on executing a personal bond in sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer. The applicant shall also abide by the following conditions: '(i) that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation before the Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the applicant shall not act, in any manner, which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial; and (iv) that the applicant shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court till disposal of the trial.'

Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge Nimmi