Smt. Manisha Roy v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 170 of 2021

1. Smt. Manisha Roy W/o Shri Suresh Roy Aged About 42 Years Occupation Class 4th / Choukidar Karmi Govt. Pre Matric Aadivashi Girls Hostel, Marwahi, Dist.- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Sachiv, Aadim Jati Tatha Anusuchit Jati Vikas Vibhag, Mantralay Naya Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Aayukt Aadim Jati Tatha Anusuchit Jati Vikas Raipur, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

3. Sahayak Aayukt Aadivasi Vikas, Bilaspur, Distt.- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh),

4. Collector Bilaspur, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate.

For State : Smt. Hamida Siddiqui, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 02.02.2021

1. The Petitioner through the present Writ Petition seek for a direction to the Respondents to take decision on the claim of the Petitioner for placing her services as contingency paid employees.

2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that present Petitioner is working with the Respondents since 2009. The Petitioner meanwhile had moved an application before the Respondents for considering her claim for placing her as contingency paid employee taking into consideration the past services of the Petitioner rendered with the Respondents.

3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner has already made a detailed representation before the authorities

concerned which is pending consideration and has till now not been decided by the Respondents Authorities. Therefore, a limited direction may be issued to Respondent No.3 to take an appropriate decision on the claim of the Petitioner to consider the matter for being placed as contingency paid employee.

4. Learned State Counsel has no objection if the Petition is disposed off with a direction to Respondent No.3 for considering the representation of the Petitioner.

5. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition stands disposed off with a direction to Respondent No.3 to consider the representation made by the Petitioner and take a decision on the claim of the Petitioner in accordance with the rules governing the field.

6. It is expected that Respondent No.3 shall take a decision on the claim of the Petitioner as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 90 days from today.

7. With the aforesaid observation, the present Writ Petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Jyotijha