High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6805/2019disposed off

Alok Pandey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-08-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6805 of 2019 Alok Pandey S/o R.B. Pandey Aged About 39 Years Currently Working As Assistant Grade-2 In The Office Of District Programme Officer Women And Child Welfare, District Korba, R/o Jail Road, Mohlainbhata, Ward No.8, Block Katghora, District Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Welfare, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner Department Of Women And Child Welfare, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Collector District Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh

4. District Programme Officer / District Women And Child Welfare Officer Korba, District Korba.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Vaibhav Shukla, Advocate For State :

Mr. P. Acharya, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 30.08.2019

1. The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order of transfer Annexure P-1 dated 21.08.2019, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Korba to Kanker.

2. The contention of the petitioner is that for the last 12 years the petitioner has been working in a Scheduled Area and now again is being sent to a Scheduled Area contrary to the transfer policy of the State Government.

-23. Considering the aforesaid facts and also taking note of the transfer policy so far as transferring a person from One scheduled Area to another Scheduled Area is concerned, let petitioner make a detailed representation to the respondents within period of 10 days today and respondents in turn shall decide the same within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

4. Till the representation of the petitioner is decided, the effect and operation of the impugned order so far as the petitioner is concerned shall remain stayed.

5. With the aforesaid observations, the present Writ Petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit