← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6193/2018disposed off

Ashok Kumar v. Sanchalak

2018-09-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6193 of 2018 Ashok Kumar S/o Samliya Loniya Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Ghutku Thana Koni, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Sanchalak Aayurved Yog Avm Prakritik Chikitsha, Yunani, Sidh Avm Homeopathy Aayush Chhattisgarh Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Jila Aayurved Adhikari, Karyalay Jila Aayurved Adhikari Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

3. Pracharya/ Adhishak Shash. Aayurvedic, Chikitshalaya/ Mahavidhyalaya Nutanchouk Sarkanda Bilaspur Thana Sarkanda District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

4. Sanyukt Sanchalak, Kosh Lekha Avm Pension Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate For State :

Ms. Astha Shukla, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 20/09/2018

1. The claim of the petitioner in the present writ petition is that the retiral dues payable to the petitioner has not been paid to him in its entirety.

2. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been paid only the Provident Fund amount of Rs.2,80,185/- so also the Group Insurance of Rs.44,139/-. He submits that he has not been paid any other dues payable to him.

3. Given the limited grievance, which the petitioner has raised, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would meet if the respondents No.2 & 3 shall personally consider the dues payable to the petitioner considering the service book and other records

available in the office of the respondents No.2 & 3 and thereafter intimate the petitioner in respect of his dues that has already been paid to him and how much balance is left to be paid and in case if any amount is yet to be paid to the petitioner, all efforts should be made to release the same within a period of 90 days.

4. It is the responsibility of the petitioner to bring it to the notice of the respondents No.2 & 3 about the order passed by this Court is concerned.

5. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved