High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6858/2019disposed off

Sonendra Kumar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 6858 of 2019 Sonendra Kumar S/o Shri Kunwar Das, Aged About 26 Years R/o Fulwari Khurd, Post Bhalukhodra Tahsil Lormi, Police Station Lalpur, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Agriculture And Farmer Welfare And Bio Technology Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Matralaya, Atal Nagar New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Deputy Secretary, Agriculture And Farmer Welfare And Bio Technology Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Director, Director Of Horticulture And Prakshetra Vaniki, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. The Assistant Director, Horticulture Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. C. K. Sahu, Advocate For State :

Mr. Ashutosh Mishra, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 05.09.2019

1. Challenge in the present writ petition is to the order of transfer dated 23.8.2019 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from the Office

of Assistant Director, Horticulture, Mungeli, District Mungeli to the Office of Assistant Director, Horticulture, Kanker.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a probationer in service as he was appointed only on 24.04.2018 and the probation period is of two years. He further submits that the regulation of the State Government itself holds that the probationer should not be transferred during the probation period.

3. Given the aforesaid fact, let the petitioner within 10 days from today make an appropriate representation to respondent no.2 who in turn shall consider and decide the same within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of representation.

4. Till the representation is decided, the effect and operation of the impugned order shall remain stayed so far as the petitioner is concerned.

5. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Khatai