High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6898/2019disposed off

Khemraj Deshmukh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6898 of 2019 Khemraj Deshmukh S/o Sarjuram Deshmukh Aged About 56 Years By Occupation Assistant Veterinary Filed Officer, Veterinary Hospital, Latabod, Block Balod, District Balod Chhattisgarh., District : Balod, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Animal Husbandry And Veterinary Services, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Under Secretary Department Of Animal Husbandary And Veterinary Services, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Director Directorate Of Veterinary Services Indrawati Bhawan, Block Iii, Ground Floor, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Shri Hiralal Yadav Assistant Veterinary Filed Officer, Veterinary Hospital Thankhamhariya, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh., District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Anand Shukla, Advocate For State :

Mr. Ayaz Naved, GA Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 05/09/2019

1. The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 22.08.2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from Balod to Bemetara.

2. Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner wants that the petitioner may be permitted to make a

representation to the respondents raising the objections and grievances on his being transferred and the respondents in turn may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

3. Not opposed.

4. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner if he so chooses may prefer a detailed representation to the respondents, which in turn considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit