High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/7196/2019disposed off

Ku. Santoshi Rajwade v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7196 of 2019 Ku. Santoshi Rajwade D/o Shri Gorelal Rajwade Aged About 25 Years Working As Rural Horticulture Extension Officer, Government Nursery, Gumgarakala, Block- Lakhanpur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh The Secretary, Agriculture And Farmer Welfare And Bio Technology, Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Deputy Secretary Agriculture And Farmer Welfare And Bio Technology, Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Director, Director Of Horticulture And Prakashtra Vaniki, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. The Deputy Director Horticulture Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. R. V. Rajwade, Advocate For State :

Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 16/09/2019

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order of transfer Annexure P-1 dated 23.08.2019 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Lakhanpur District Surguja, to Surajpur.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a probationer in service as she was appointed only on 24.04.2018 and the probation period is of two years. He further submits that the regulation of the State

Government itself holds that the probationer should not be transferred during the probation period.

3. Given the aforesaid fact, let petitioner make an appropriate representation to the respondent No. 4 who in turn shall consider and decide the same within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of representation.

4. Till the representation is decided, the effect and operation of the impugned order shall remain stayed so far as the petitioner is concerned.

5. The present Writ Petition, accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit