Mantvya Agrawal v. Satyam Agrawal

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (Art. 227) No. 835 of 2018 Mantvya Agrawal, son of Shri Satyam Agrawal, aged about 03 years, Minor through natural guardian mother Smt. Priyanka Agrawal, wife of Shri Satyam Agrawal, resident of Near Maharashtra Mandal, Dipak Nagar, Durg, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.) ----Petitioner

Versus

1. Satyam Agrawal, son of Shri Rajeev Ratan Agrawal, aged about 32 years, resident of Near Maharashtra Mandal, Dipak Nagar, Durg, Tahsil Durg, District Durg (C.G.)

2. Smt. Saroj Agrawal, widow of Late Rajeev Ratna Agrawal, aged about 64 years.

3. Kumari Aradhana Agrawal, d/o Late Rajeev Ratna Agrawal, aged about 24 years. No. 2 & 3 are residents of Sheetla Mandir Marg, Baigapara, Durg, Tahsil & District Durg (C.G.)

4. Smt. Yachna Agrawal, wife of Shri Prashant Agrawal, aged about 30 years, resident of Behind Apsara Talkies, Gurudwara Road, Santrabadi, Durg, Tahsil & District Durg.

5. Sandeep Agrawal, son of Shri Netram Agrawal, aged about 30 years, resident of 67, Nehru Nagar (East), Bhilai, Tahsil & District Durg. 6.

Meesa Finvest Private Limited, Beliyaghat, Kolkata, Director- Sandeep Agrawal, son of Shri Netram Agrawal, aged about 30 years, resident of 67, Nehru Nagar (East), Bhilai, Tahsil & District Durg. 7.

Netram Agrawal, son of Late ML Agrawal, aged about 60 years, resident of 67, Nehru Nagar (East), Bhilai, Tahsil & District Durg. 8.

Meesa Finvest Private Limited, Beliyaghat, Kolkata, Director- Sanjay Agrawal, son of Shri Netram Agrawal, aged about 36 years, resident of 67, Nehru Nagar (East), Bhilai, Tahsil & District Durg.

9.

State of Chhattisgarh, through the Collector, District Durg. ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Manay Nath Thakur, Advocate.

For Respondents No. 5 & 6 : Mr. Anurag Singh, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 31/01/2019 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition as the matter has been compromised out of the court in terms of judgment and decree dated 08/10/2018.

(2) He is permitted to do so.

(3) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No cost(s). Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-