High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/3041/2019disposed off

Shri Mahaprabhuji Pragatya Baithakji Trust (P.T.R.No.158,Raipur) v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-01-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3041 of 2019 Shri Mahaprabhuji Pragatya Baithakji Trust (P.T.R.No.158, Raipur) Through Managing Trustee Kumandas K. Adhia, Aged About 60 Years, S/o Krishnadas Adhia, Village And Post Champaran, Police Station Gobra Nawapara, Tahsil Abhanpur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralya, Raipur, Tahsil And DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The Collector Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Sub-Divisional Officer Abhanpur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Nayab Tahsildar Gobra Nawapara, Tahsil- Abhanpur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

5. Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Champaran, Tahsil- Abhanpur, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh.

6. M/s A. K. Pataria And Corporation Chartered Accounted, Ekatma Parisar, Rajbandha Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

7. Shri Champeshwarnath Mahadev Mandir Trust Committee (P.T.R. No. 228, Raipur) Through President, Village Champa Jhar, Tahsil Abhanpur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Sachin Nidhi, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Y.C. Sharma, Advocate For State :

Mr. P. Acharya, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 27/01/2020

1. The counsel for the petitioner at the outset submits that the limited prayer that he seeks at this juncture is for a direction to the respondent No.2 to take a decision on the representation of the petitioner has filed in respect of the functioning of the said trust.

2. The said limited request is not opposed by the State counsel.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the respondent No.2 to take a decision on the representation of the petitioner on its own merit in accordance with law at the earliest preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.

4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. The respondent No.2 shall be at liberty to decide the same in accordance with law.

5. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved