← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6174/2018disposed off

Yamini Baghel v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-09-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6174 of 2018

1. Yamini Baghel W/o Shri Ramlal Baghel, Aged About 33 Years, Working As Teacher (Panchayat) And Posted At Govt. Middle School Kerajhariya, Block Pali, District Korba Chhattisgarh.

2. Ku. Suniti Nandi D/o Late Shri S.K. Nandi, Aged About 48 Years, Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Nankatthi, District Durg Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For petitioners :

Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate.

For State :

Shri Ratan Pusty, Government Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 20/09/2018 1.

The Petitioners are aggrieved by the action of the Respondents, whereby the increment granted to the Petitioners is being withdrawn on the ground that they have not passed B.Ed/D. Ed examination. 2.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the issue with regard to withdrawal/non-grant of increment on the ground of having not passed B.Ed/D.Ed examination was examined by this Court in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle v. State of Chhattisgarh (WPS No.4271 of 2017 and batch of

petitions, vide order dated 03.11.2017) and various directions have been issued for affording proper opportunity of hearing and then decide the matter.

3.

Learned Counsel for the State submits that the Petitioners claim would be examined after affording opportunity of hearing in terms of order dated 03.11.2017 passed in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle (supra). 4.

Considering the aforesaid submission, this petition is finally disposed of, with a direction to the Respondents for examination of Petitioners claim in terms of order passed by this Court in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle (supra) and take appropriate decision thereon. 5.

The writ petition stands accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Sumit JUDGE