Manjeet Kaur v. State Of Chhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 6238 of 2016 Manjeet Kaur W/o Harpreet Singh Aged About 48 Years R/o House No. 78 Sunder Nager, Vaishali Nager, Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through : Station House Officer, Supela, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For applicant - Shri Chandra Bhushan Kesharwani, Advocate. For Respondent/State - Shri Neeraj Jain, G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order 8/11/2016 1.

The applicant has preferred this application for grant of bail as she is arrested in connection with Crime No.437/2016 registered in Police Station Supela, Bhilai for offence punishable under sections 406, 420 of IPC.

2.

As per the prosecution case, a report was made by Yogita Banjare and Soniya Lahre that the present applicant shown herself to be coach for Rakbi in Dhanwantri School and collected Rs.2000/- from each student, thereafter for 2-3 days training was given and it was stopped. Subsequently, Rs.5000/- was taken from Yogita Banjare and Soniya Lahre and she took them to Bhuneshwar but no certificate was given. Thereafter, it was explained that Rs.35,000/- would be paid to student who had participated in the national and for which Rs.1000/- commission was to be given. Subsequently, amount was paid but eventually cheque which was given of Rs.35,000/- was bounced. Thereby, the applicant has committed fraud with the students.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the report made was followed by Social Right Organization Kamlesh Dubey against whom

report was made earlier by the applicant. He further submits that charge sheet has been filed, false allegations have been levelled against the applicant, no further evidence is required, therefore the applicant may be released on bail.

4.

Learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of bail. 5.

Perused the case diary and the documents and the statement. Charge sheet in this case has been filed. Taking into nature of allegation and the facts involved in this case and the evidence appears to be documentary in nature. Taking into such fact, without further observation on the merits, this court is inclined to release the applicant on bail. 6.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant shall be released on her furnishing personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of concerned trial court for her regular appearance before it as and when directed.

Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) JUDGE gouri