High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/7007/2019disposed off

Smt. Ranjana Trivedi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 7007 of 2019 Smt. Ranjana Trivedi W/o Anil Kumar Trivedi, Aged About 51 Years, Presently Posted As Supervisor At Integrate Child Development Project, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh R/o AS-99, Asma Delux Home, Sakri Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Development, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Under Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Development, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Commissioner, Women And Child Development Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Collector Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

5. District Project Officer, Women And Child Development, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Prafull N. Bharat, Advocate For State :

Ms. Ishwari Ghritlahare, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 03.09.2019

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order Annexure P-1 dated 21.08.2019 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from

Integrated Child Development Project, Bilaspur to Integrated Child Development Project, Mainpur, district Gariyaband.

2. The contention of the petitioner is that her husband is posted at Bilaspur and as per the transfer policy, as far as possible husband and wife should be retained at the same place. The second ground of challenge is that from 2010 to 2014 the petitioner has already worked in District Bastar and thereafter, the petitioner should have been sent to a non-scheduled area whereas the petitioner is now again being sent to a scheduled area which is a violation to the transfer policy of the State.

3. Given the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner make a detailed representation to the respondents within a period of 10 days from today and the respondents in turn shall consider the same within a further period of 45 days from the date of receipt of the representation.

4. Till the representation of the petitioner is decided, the effect and operation of the impugned order so far as the petitioner is concerned shall remain stayed.

5. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition accordingly stands disposed of.

Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Khatai