High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/7023/2019disposed off

Gokulnath Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7023 of 2019 Gokulnath Yadav S/o Shri Kamal Singh Yadav Aged About 40 Years Presently Posted As Cluster Academic Coordinator (Cac) At Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Cluster Chhotedongar, District Narayanpur, R/o Banglapara Narayanpur, District Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary School Education Department Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector Narayanpur, District Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh

3. Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Sarv Shiksha Abhiyan Through Its Mission Director, State Project Office Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. District Education Officer Narayanpur District Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh

5. Block Education Officer Narayanpur, District Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh

6. Rohit Kumar Dhaneliya Teacher (L.B.) Government Middle School Chhotedongar, Block Narayanpur, District Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh ----Respondents For Petitioner :

Ms. Diksha Gauraha, Advocate For State :

Ms. Ishwari Ghritlahare, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 04/09/2019

1. The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 31.07.2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from Chhotedongar, Block Narayanpur to Dongripara, Block Narayanpur.

2. Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner wants that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents raising the objections and

grievances on his being transferred and the respondents in turn may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

3. Not opposed.

4. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner if he so chooses may prefer a detailed representation to the respondents, which in turn considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved