Yogesh Kumar Singh Kshatri v. State Of Chhattisgarh,
-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 214 of 2021
1. Yogesh Kumar Singh Kshatri S/o Surendra Singh Aged About 43 Years R/o Government I T I Dabhra, Near Degree College, Dabhra, District - Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
2. Ravikiran Bhardwaj S/o Rajendra Kumar Bhardwaj Aged About 38 Years R/o Q.N. G / 106, Nit Campus Raipur Police Station - Saraswati Nagar Tehsil - District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Savita Singh, S/o Ramdev Singh, Aged About 31 Years R/o Are No 810, Front Of Adarsh Hospital, Milan Chowk, Camp-2, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of Man Power Planning Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Director, Directorate Of Employment And Training, Indrawati Bhawan Block 4 First Floor, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioner :
Shri Faisal Akhtar, Advocate.
For State :
Shri Shakti Singh Thakur, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 03.02.2021 .
1. The grievance of the petitioners in the present writ petition is the inaction on the part of the respondents in not holding the DPC for promotion to the post of Training Superintendent from the post of Training Officer.
2. According to the petitioners, they are candidates who are Diploma holders and were appointed as Training Officer in the year 2013. Under the promotion Rules for an engineering degree holder, the promotion to the post of Training Superintendent requires six years
-2of service experience, seven years is required for diploma holder and eight years for ITI holder. The petitioners, since they have completed seven years of service, have become eligible for promotion.
3. According to the petitioners, there is also sanction vacant posts available with the Department and for which the DPC has not been convened for last many years.
4. According to the petitioners, let the respondents be directed to consider the claim of the petitioners for promotion in accordance with the Rules governing the filed and also keeping in view Rule 6 (4) of the Chhattisgarh Public Services (Promotion) Rules 2003.
5. The said request made by the Counsel for the Petitioner is not opposed by the State Counsel.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondentauthorities to consider the claim of the petitioner for promotion by holding a suitable DPC in accordance with Rules at the earliest preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
7.
The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Jyotijha