High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/7020/2019disposed off

Shivkumar Ayam v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7020 of 2019 Shivkumar Ayam S/o Jeet Lal Singh Aged About 52 Years Working As Assistant Internal Account Audit Taxation Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur- Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Deputy Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, District BalrampurRamanujganj, Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh

4. Lawansai Bhagat Posted As Assistant Internal Account Audit Taxation Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Balrampur, District BalrampurRamanujganj, Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh ----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Bishnu Mani, Advocate on behalf of Mr. D.N. Prajapati, Advocate For State :

Mr. Ashutosh Mishra, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 04/09/2019

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 22.08.2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from Janpad Panchayat Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur Ramanujganj to Janpad Panchayat Rachandrapur, District BalrampurRamanujganj.

2. The challenge is on the ground that the petitioner is a Block President of the Chhattisgarh Gond Karmachari Kalyan Parishad, a registered body and thereby the petitioner falls within the protected category under the transfer policy of the State Government.

3. Given the said facts, let the petitioner make a detailed representation to the respondents within a period of 10 days from today and the respondents in turn shall decide the representation within a further period of 45 days from the date of receipt of representation. Meanwhile, there shall be a stay of the effect and operation of the impugned order, so far as the petitioner is concerned.

4. The authorities concerned are also directed to verify the fact whether the petitioner does fall under the protected category under the transfer policy of the State Government or not.

5. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved