Shatrughan Singh, v. State Of Chhattisgarh,

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 8767 of 2021 Shatrughan Singh, S/o Swadh Chhotan Singh, Aged About 50 Years R/o- Village - Kanjiya, Police Station and Tehsil - Kusmi, District - Balrampur - Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh, ---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh, Through - S.H.O Police StationSamripath District - Balrampur - Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh, ---- Respondent.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant :

Mr. Pushkar Sinha, Advocate.

For Respondent/State :

Mr. Anurag Verma, PL ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajni D ubey Order On Board 16.12.2021 This first application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the accused/applicant, who is languishing in jail since 11.09.2021 in connection with Crime No. 34/2021 registered at Police Station Samripath, District Balrampur Ramanujganj for the offence punishable under Sections 342,420,467,468,120(b),34 IPC. 2.

The prosecution case in nutshell is that complainant Nageshiya lodged a written report against co-accused Yusuf Ansari and Jagsai Ram stating therein that accused abducted him and made correction in the revenue record from Scheduled Tribe to General category and thereafter they made entry of his name in the land of his in-laws and registered the land to some other person.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been roped in a false and fabricated case and therefore, he may be set at liberty by granting bail. He submits that the applicant would abide by all terms and conditions imposed on him while granting bail. 4.

Learned State counsel however puts forth his vehement opposition to the prayer for bail.

5.

Having heard counsel for the parties, taken into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also keeping in mind the nature of allegations made, this Court is of the opinion that the accused/applicant is entitled for bail. Accordingly, the application is allowed and it is directed that on applicant's furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with one solvent surety to the satisfaction of the concerned Court, he shall be released on bail. The applicant however, shall ensure his appearance before the trial Court as and when so directed, till the disposal of the case. Order accordingly.

Sd/- (Rajni Dubey) Judge Santosh