← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6983/2019disposed off

Dr. Narayan Singh Gond v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6983 of 2019 Dr. Narayan Singh Gond S/o Shri Dayal Singh Aged About 39 Years Presently Working As Ayurved Medical Officer R/o Shanti Niwas, Amandon Road, Pratappur District Surajpur Chhattisgarh, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Deputy Secretary Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. District Ayurved Officer Office Of District Auyurved Officer, Trikon Chowk, Bhatti Road Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

4. Dr. Mahant Lal Sonmani Ayurved Medical Officer, Presently Posted At Governement Ayurved Hospital, Ranhat, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh, District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Pawan Kesharwani, Advocate For State :

Mr. Ayaz Naved, GA Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 06/09/2019

1. The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 21.08.2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from Surajpur to Balrampur.

2. Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner wants that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents raising the objections and

grievances on his being transferred and the respondents in turn may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

3. Not opposed.

4. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner if he so chooses may prefer a detailed representation to the respondents, which in turn considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit