High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/7044/2019disposed off

Smt. Rekhni Bai Dhruw v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7044 of 2019

1. Smt. Rekhni Bai Dhruw W/o Late Shri Tekuram Dhruw Aged About 44 Years R/o Village Jhiriya Tehsil And Block Simga, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

2. Ku. Chuneshwari Dhruw D/o Late Shri Tekuram Dhruw Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Jhiriya Tehsil And Block Simga, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Panchayat And Rural Development Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Collector Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

5. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Simga, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Pawan Shrivastava, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Jitendra Pali, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 09/09/2019

1. Counsel for the petitioners has made an oral request to make a correction in the cause title, so far as the typographical error is concerned.

2. The said prayer of the counsel for the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, let necessary correction be made out by the counsel for the petitioner during the course of the day itself.

3. The grievance of the petitioners is that their claim for compassionate appointment till date has not been finalized and it is under process for last more than 15 years.

4. According to the petitioners, the husband of the petitioner No.1 late Tekuram Dhruw died in harness working as an Assistant Teacher (Panchayat) on 01.06.2003. The petitioner No.1 had applied for the compassionate appointment in the year 2004 and again made another application in the year 2006. All these applications have till date not been finalized and last correspondence made by the respondent No.5 to the respondent No.4 in this regard is Annexure P/1 dated 25.06.2018.

5. Given the fact that the respondents have till date not finalized the application for compassionate appointment, let the respondents No.3 & 4 take an appropriate decision so far as the claim of the petitioners for compassionate appointment is concerned at the earliest in accordance with the scheme for compassionate appointment applicable at the relevant time at the earliest preferably within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.

6. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved