High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5576/2020disposed off

Rammanohar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-01-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5576 of 2020 Rammanohar S/o Shri Bhagwandas Aged About 42 Years Occupation Class 4/ Safai Karmi Shash. Pri Matric Aadiwashi Chatrawas Lakhram District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Aadim Jati And Anusuchit Jati Vikash Vibhag, Mantralay Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner Aadim Jati And Anusuchit Jati Vikash Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Collector, Bilaspur, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

4. Assistant Commissioner, Aadiwashi Vikash Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate For State :

Mr. Aditya Bhargava, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 28/01/2021

1. The Petitioners through the present Writ Petition seek for a direction to the Respondents to take decision on the claim of the Petitioner for placing their services as contingency paid employees.

2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that present Petitioner is working with the Respondents since 2009. The Petitioner meanwhile had moved an application before the Respondents for considering their claim for placing them as contingency paid employee taking into consideration the past services of the Petitioner rendered with the Respondents.

3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner has already made detailed representation before the authorities concerned which is pending consideration and has till now not been decided by the Respondents Authorities. Therefore, a limited direction may be issued to Respondent No.3 to take appropriate decision on the claim of the Petitioners to consider their matter for being placed as contingency paid employee.

4. Learned State Counsel has no objection if the Petition is disposed off with a direction to Respondent No.3 for considering the representation of the Petitioner.

5. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition stands disposed off with a direction to Respondent No.3 to consider the representation made by the Petitioner and take decision on the claim of the Petitioner in accordance with the rules governing the field.

6. It is expected that Respondent No.3 shall take a decision on the claim of the Petitioner as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 90 days from today.

7. With the aforesaid observation the present Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit