← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/7330/2019disposed off

Anil Thokane v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7330 of 2019 Anil Thokane S/o Gajpat Rao Thokane Aged About 58 Years Head Warder, Central Jail Durg, Police Sub Station Padhamanapur, Police Station Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home ( Jail ) Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, General Administration Department, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. The Jail And Correctional Services, Chhattisgarh, The Director General Prisons, Jail Road, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. The Jail Superintendant, Central Jail, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Sunil Pillai, Advocate For State :

Mr. Jitendra Pali, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 23/09/2019

1. The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 23.08.2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from Durg to Jagdalpur.

2. Challenge is on the ground Health ground of the petitioner. Contention of the petitioner is that recently the petitioner has been detected the disease of Cancer and his treatment is undergoing at Sanjeevani Hospital at Raipur and therefore at this juncture, while his treatment is undergoing he should not be subjected to transfer and sympathetic consideration be made to the petitioner.

3. Given the facts, let petitioner make a representation to the respondent No.1 within a period of 10 days from today and on receipt of representation of the petitioner, respondent No. 1 is expected to take a decision sympathetically within a further period of 45 days.

4. Till the representation of the petitioner is decided, the effect and operation of the impugned order shall remain stayed so far as petitioner is concerned.

5. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit