High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRCA/1807/2020rejected

Raghvendra Tiwari Alias Sonu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-03-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

MCRCA No. 1807 of 2020 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRCA No. 1807 of 2020

1. Raghvendra Tiwari alias Sonu, aged about 39 years, S/o Dhruw Kumar Tiari, R/o Shikshak Nagar, Durg, PS Durg, Tehsil and District Durg (father's name wrongly mentioned as residence in impugned order) ---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through PS Sarkanda, District Bilaspur (CG) ---- Non-Applicant For Applicant : Shri Priyank Rathi, Advocate.

For Non-Applicant : Shri Ravish Verma, Govt. Advocate. For Objector : Shri Prateek Sharma, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 01/03/2021 :

1. The applicant has preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail as he apprehends his arrest in connection with Crime No.1131/2020, registered at Police Station Sarkanda, District Bilaspur for offence punishable under Sections 120-B/34, 406, 408 and 420 of the IPC.

2. The applicant was an employee as well as supplier to the company M/s Rite Water Solutions (India) Private Limited, Ambajhari, Nagpur. The company was engaged in supplying Water ATM to different local bodies in the State of Chhattisgarh. The applicant instead of sending payments received from different local bodies to the company, retained the same by asking the local bodies to deposit the payments in his account or in the accounts opened by him in the name of his own firm or in the name of M/s Rite Water Solutions (India) Pvt Ltd.

MCRCA No. 1807 of 2020

3. Even if the applicant had some dispute regarding payment of salary or the payments concerning his transactions with the company, his act of fraudulently opening the account in the name of M/s Rite Water Solutions (India) Pvt Ltd or persuading the local bodies to make payments of the amounts in his account is an act attracting the offences alleged against the applicant.

4. Therefore, considering the nature of allegations, I am not inclined to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the applicant. Accordingly, the application is rejected.

Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Barve