Dimpi @ Sneha Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 6206 of 2016 • Dimpi @ Sneha Singh W/o Ashwin Pal Aged About 33 Years R/o Near Shiv Mandir Kapa Nara Para, Police Station- Pandri, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner

Versus

• State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station- Pandri, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent For the applicant :

Mr. C. R. Sahu, Advocate For the Respondent :

Mr. Anil S. Pandey, Govt. Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order on Board 24.10.2016

1. This is first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking grant of regular bail to the applicant in connection with Crime No. 130/2016 registered at P.S. Pandri, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G) for the offence punishable under Sections 294, 506, 302, 120-B/34, 109 IPC.

2. As per the prosecution case, One Deepak Yadav was murdered on 29.04.2016 for the reason that the family members of Deepak Yadav used to object the business of prostitution which was being carried out by the present applicant and in order to get rid of Deepak, the applicant hired 3 persons namely Gopal Tandi, Pawan Baghel and Laxman @ Babu Ram and conspired to eliminate him. Consequent thereupon, Deepak Yadav was eliminated.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case and no

evidence is available against the present applicant and only on the memorandum statement of other accused, the applicant has been inculpated, therefore, she may be enlarged on bail.

4. Per contra, learned State Counsel opposes the bail.

5. Perused the case diary and documents. The case diary contains various conversations between the other accused and the present applicant who conspired to eliminate the deceased and other accused were used for this purpose.

6. Taking into such evidence and call details, I am not inclined to allow the bail application. Accordingly, it is rejected. Sd/- GOUTAM BHADURI JUDGE R a o