Smt. Sandhya Rani Nag v. Mohan Chand Hathgen
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 886 of 2019
1. Smt. Sandhya Rani Nag W/o Late Rajendra Kumar Nag Aged About 37 Years R/o House of Santu Lal Banjare, Mahamaya Bhawan, Green Park Colony, In Front Of S.B.R. College, Jarhabhata, Police Station Civil Lines, Bilaspur, Tahsil And Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Ku. Vandana Nag D/o Late Rajendra Kumar Nag Aged About 22 Years R/o House Of Santu Lal Banjare, Mahamaya Bhawan, Green Park Colony, In Front Of S.B.R. College, Jarhabhata, Police Station Civil Lines, Bilaspur, Tahsil And Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
3. Ku. Apurva Nag D/o Late Rajendra Kumar Nag Aged About 20 Years R/o House Of Santu Lal Banjare, Mahamaya Bhawan, Green Park Colony, In Front Of S.B.R. College, Jarhabhata, Police Station Civil Lines, Bilaspur, Tahsil And Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
4. Sumit Nag S/o Late Rajendra Kumar Nag Aged About 15 Years Through His Mother Smt. Sandhya Rani Nag, R/o House Of Santu Lal Banjare, Mahamaya Bhawan, Green Park Colony, In Front Of S.B.R. College, Jarhabhata, Police Station Civil Lines, Bilaspur, Tahsil And Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Applicants
Versus
1. Mohan Chand Hathgen S/o Mithai Lal Hathgen Aged About 55 Years Qtr No. 37/01, Kasim Para, Torva, Police Station Torva, Bilaspur, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. Presently R/o Branch Manager, State Bank Of India, Mungeli Branch, Police Station Mungeli, Revenue District Mungeli, Civil District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh.
2. Division Manager The New India Assurance Company Limited, Rama Trade Centre, 2nd Floor, In Front Of Rajeev Plaza, Near Old Bus Stand, Bilaspur, Police Station Tarbahar, Civil And Revenue, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., ---- Non-Applicants For Applicants:
Shri Raj Bahadur Singh, Advocate.
For Non-Applicant No.2:
Shri B.N. Nande, Advocate.
Single Bench:Hon'ble Shri Sanjay Agrawal, J Order On Board
27.09.2019 1.
Heard on admission.
2.
This M.C.C. has been filed for restoration of MAC No. 749 of 2014, which was dismissed in default by this Court vide order dated 22.08.2019. 3.
For the reasons assigned in the application for restoration of the said appeal, I am inclined to allow the same.
4.
Accordingly, the instant M.C.C. is allowed and MAC No. 749 of 2014 is restored to its original number.
Sd/- (Sanjay Agrawal) JUDGE vivek