← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/6115/2016dismissed

Rajachand Khobragarhe v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-10-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

Page No.1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.CR.C. No. 6115 of 2016

1. Rajachand Khobragarhe, S/o. Roopchand Khobragarhe, aged about 26 years, R/o. Ganesh Ward No.10, Tahsil - Dongargarh, Police Station Dongargarh, District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ----Applicant

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : District Magistrate, Rajnandgaon, District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ---- Respondent For Applicants : Mr. B.P. Singh, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Anil S. Pandey, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 04/10/2016 1.

This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.166/2016, registered at Police Station - Kotwali, District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 419, 420, 467, 468, 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2.

As per the prosecution case, the land which was in the name of Manoj Kumar, Sufal and Dwarika was sold to one Sufiyan Saeed Khan by Venketesh, Teekamram and Krishna by false personification and fake Aadhar Card, Rin Pustika and Voter ID was prepared by the present applicant. Thereby the offence has been committed.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted actually

Page No.2 the sale has been made by Venketesh, Krishna and Teekamram and others and he has not committed any offence. It is further submitted that charge-sheet in this case has been filed and the applicant is in jail since 17.05.2016. Therefore, the counsel submits that the applicant may be enlarged on bail.

4.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

5.

I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 6.

Perused the case diary and documents. As per the memorandum of the co-accused, Tikamram, it is alleged that forged Aadhar Card, Rin Pustika, Voter ID was being prepared by the present applicant and on that basis CPU, Pen Drive were recovered. Considering the fact and the way mass forged documents were prepared and the land of the villagers were sold. Taking into such fact I am not inclined to release the applicant on bail at this stage. 7.

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is dismissed.

Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Balram