← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCRMP/1132/2017withdrawn

Ravi Agrawal v. Atul Sete

2021-09-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRMP No. 1132 of 2017 Ravi Agrawal, S/o Shri Vijay Kumar Agrawal, Aged About 37 Years, R/o New Road, Near Subhash Chowk, Raigarh, P.S. City Kotwali- Raigarh Tehsil & District- Raigarh (C.G.) --- Petitioner

Versus

Atul Sete, Posted as Tehsildar Raigarh, Haal Mukam S.D.M. (Anuvihagiya Dandadhikari), Lailunga, District- Raigarh (C.G.) --- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, Adv.

For Respondent :

Mr. Swajeet Singh Ubeja, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 23/09 /2021 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file appropriate application for grant of sanction before State Government. 2.

Prayer is allowed.

3.

Accordingly, this petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRMP No. 1100 of 2021 Ravi Agrawal, S/o Shri Vijay Kumar Agrawal, presently aged about 41 years, R/o New Road, Near Subhash Chowk, Raigarh, P.S. City Kotwali- Raigarh, Tehsil & District- Raigarh (C.G.) --- Petitioner

Versus

Atul Sete, Posted as Tehsildar Raigarh, Haal Mukam S.D.M. (Anuvihagiya Dandadhikari), Lailunga, District- Raigarh (C.G.) --- Respondent For Petitioner :

Mr. Bharat Gulabani, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 21/10 /2021 1.

The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. for modification of order dated 23.09.2021 passed by this Court in CRMP No. 1132 of 2017.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that this Court vide order dated 23.09.2021 in CRMP No. 1132 of 2017 has granted liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate application for grant of sanction before State Government. He would further submit that instead of that liberty, the petitioner may be granted liberty to file Criminal Revision.

3.

Prayer is allowed.

4.

The order passed by this Court in CRMP No. 1132 of 2017 is modified to the extent that instead of liberty granted to the

petitioner to file appropriate application for grant of sanction before State Government, the petitioner is granted liberty to file Criminal Revision before the appropriate forum, in accordance with law.

5.

Rest of the order dated 23.09.2021 passed by this Court in CRMP No. 1132 of 2017 shall remain intact.

6.

In view of the above, the instant petition stands disposed of. 7.

A copy of this order be kept in the order dated 23.09.2021 passed in CRMP No. 1132 of 2017.

Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun